Which marine invertebrates are most likely to respond favourably to a priming exposure, judged from genome and life-history features — species ranked, of them with evidence in the Conditioning Atlas.
Every species in the curated panel, ranked by the rubric under the current weights. Tier is the top, middle, or bottom third of this panel. Coverage is how much of the score rests on curated values rather than taxon-level imputation. Click a row to inspect it.
Rank and tier first; the numeric score sits behind the breakdown. Each bar's length is the feature's weight and its fill is the species' score on that feature. Solid bars are curated from the literature, striped bars are computed from the public assembly, hatched bars are imputed from the taxon mean.
What the Conditioning Atlas actually contains for this species and its taxon. This is shown beside the rubric, not blended into it: the atlas's direction ratios reflect which stressors and designs were studied as much as biology.
Defaults are the rubric's published weights. Sliders are renormalised so the effective weights always sum to 100%. Changes are kept in this browser only and the ranking above updates live.
Enter the features of a species that is not in the panel, or vary one feature of a species that is, and see where it would fall. Leave anything unknown as not reported and it will be imputed from the chosen taxon.
Does the rubric agree with what the atlas has observed? Each point is a panel species with at least two assessable atlas experiments; the vertical axis is the share of those experiments coded Improved. With this few species it is a plausibility check, not validation, and the atlas fractions are confounded by which stressors were tested.